Skip to main content

The Audacity

It is beyond me that people of privilege have the arrogant audacity to tell those living on the margins and those living in solidarity with them how they should protest. The same thing happened with Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. If it were not so pathetically a reflection of white body privilege, it might be laughable.

The Boston Tea Party was not a tea party. It was a violent form of protest against the excessive taxation of the colonies by British rule. It result in the loss of property by those who schemed to have blame assigned to others. It is an age old practice throughout human history as powerful rulers have oppressed their subjects through excessive forms of taxation. Christian readers may recognize this unfolding in Scripture as the Jewish people were unfairly taxed by Roman authorities. 

Never has a protest been initiated with a desire to appease the powerful. Think about that for a moment. Never has a protest been initiated with a desire to appease the powerful. Protests are intended to create discomfort for the privileged. They are not to endear protestors to the system, but to compel the system to change when reason is to no avail.

By their nature, protests are designed to bring attention to a matter long ignored or dismissed by those in positions to bring about change. Colin Kaepernick sought to bring attention to the significant number of African Americans killed by law enforcement. His simple act of kneeling during the national anthem was to show the hypocrisy of honoring a national narrative when the nation's people were not protected by those sworn to protect them.

Following the extra-judicial killing of George Floyd, there were nonviolent protests in each of the 50 states by a diverse peoples. As those with ulterior motives began to commit acts of violence assigned to others. From the comfort of their homes, onlookers complained about property damage as they conflated infiltrators with members of the Black Lives Matter movement. How quickly they manage to forget that the catalyst for the protest was a law enforcement officer kneeling on a handcuffed man's neck until he died.

The next time you complain about a nonviolent protest, check yourself. Move beyond your discomfort. What are you missing? The path of nonviolence is not an easy one. Those who practice it know that they are placing themselves at risk with no guarantee of a quick resolution. What depth of conviction does it take to risk so much?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I Write on Race

No, this is not what I wanted to do.  I did not choose this as my path, but it is the path on which I journey. At this time of my life, it is the path that must be acknowledged and no longer resisted. A deep sigh reveals my coming to terms with the convergence of my lived experience, my gift of words, and this moment in time.  As a citizen of the United States dealing with the heinous and flawed construct of race is inevitable. To speak about it requires inner work that I wanted to avoid. Included in the work is one essential question. Has the racial system been designed to privilege or oppress people? While many of my fellow citizens may  deny that race is relevant to them and in their lives, for those of us who identify as Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC), the truth of our nation's original sin is our lived experience. It is no secret. My parents sought to shield me and my siblings from the oppression that infiltrated our lives in an apartheid system. Even without th

Apples and Oranges

Dear Person  with A White Body, Many of you appear to take pride and comfort in denying   white privilege.   You say the struggles  you have experienced prove you have not benefitted from having a white body in this society.    As the old saying goes, you are speaking  of apples and oranges. Personal struggles and  white body privilege are not mutually exclusive.   The concept of white privilege does not mean that you have not experienced hard times. It means the systems and structures of our society were crafted  to benefit people with white bodies.   To be honest, they were created by a few “white” men to benefit some “white” men as with the initial intention of voting being exercised only by white men who owned land.   It did not apply to people considered  to be "property" including the women they married and the people they enslaved.   Denying this reality shows  your inability to think critically about our nation's history,  an absence of the curiosity  to question

My Anger

Anger drains me -- emotionally and physically. It is an act of violence against myself and I try not to experience it intensely for this reason. The celebration or glorification of the culture of violence angers me especially when it is done by a person who has been given authority. A priest in my archdiocese posting a photo on social media of himself holding an automatic firearm, a weapon of war, while wearing his clerical collar angers me greatly. As a Black woman in a southern state, I am aware of the use of law and order rhetoric as a racist trope as is the priest's expressed intention of "protecting my people and property."  We also live in a period when stand your ground laws are used to justify murder. Sadly, I remember the murder of a child, Tamir Rice, who was killed because he was a Black boy playing with a toy gun.  There are many people who respect firearms and use them for hunting and sport. They understand and respect the deadly force at their fingertip. Gro