Skip to main content

The Audacity

It is beyond me that people of privilege have the arrogant audacity to tell those living on the margins and those living in solidarity with them how they should protest. The same thing happened with Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. If it were not so pathetically a reflection of white body privilege, it might be laughable.

The Boston Tea Party was not a tea party. It was a violent form of protest against the excessive taxation of the colonies by British rule. It result in the loss of property by those who schemed to have blame assigned to others. It is an age old practice throughout human history as powerful rulers have oppressed their subjects through excessive forms of taxation. Christian readers may recognize this unfolding in Scripture as the Jewish people were unfairly taxed by Roman authorities. 

Never has a protest been initiated with a desire to appease the powerful. Think about that for a moment. Never has a protest been initiated with a desire to appease the powerful. Protests are intended to create discomfort for the privileged. They are not to endear protestors to the system, but to compel the system to change when reason is to no avail.

By their nature, protests are designed to bring attention to a matter long ignored or dismissed by those in positions to bring about change. Colin Kaepernick sought to bring attention to the significant number of African Americans killed by law enforcement. His simple act of kneeling during the national anthem was to show the hypocrisy of honoring a national narrative when the nation's people were not protected by those sworn to protect them.

Following the extra-judicial killing of George Floyd, there were nonviolent protests in each of the 50 states by a diverse peoples. As those with ulterior motives began to commit acts of violence assigned to others. From the comfort of their homes, onlookers complained about property damage as they conflated infiltrators with members of the Black Lives Matter movement. How quickly they manage to forget that the catalyst for the protest was a law enforcement officer kneeling on a handcuffed man's neck until he died.

The next time you complain about a nonviolent protest, check yourself. Move beyond your discomfort. What are you missing? The path of nonviolence is not an easy one. Those who practice it know that they are placing themselves at risk with no guarantee of a quick resolution. What depth of conviction does it take to risk so much?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

History

History is a study of the past. It lives today in our experience of society and how society functions. History becomes complex in a pluralistic society when shaped by the conscious and unconscious biases of the dominant perspective. Those with collective power are often the ones who document what happened as well as how and why, in addition to what is omitted. The significance of history is realized in understanding how the events of yesteryear influence the circumstances of today. On a collective scale, it is similar to learning about the past of one's family - the joys and the sorrows - to understand how it influences who the person is now.  Any human with the gift of reason and any experience of the Divine should recognize racism born of white body supremacy as a grave sin created by individuals, and implemented and perpetuated by systems for five centuries. The sins of individuals for economic gain became the sins of a nation for economic gain and sanctioned by gross distortion...

Apples and Oranges

Dear Person  with A White Body, Many of you appear to take pride and comfort in denying   white privilege.   You say the struggles  you have experienced prove you have not benefitted from having a white body in this society.    As the old saying goes, you are speaking  of apples and oranges. Personal struggles and  white body privilege are not mutually exclusive.   The concept of white privilege does not mean that you have not experienced hard times. It means the systems and structures of our society were crafted  to benefit people with white bodies.   To be honest, they were created by a few “white” men to benefit some “white” men as with the initial intention of voting being exercised only by white men who owned land.   It did not apply to people considered  to be "property" including the women they married and the people they enslaved.   Denying this reality shows  your inability to think critically ...

New Site

  To read the latest on Leslye's Labyrinth, visit http://bit.ly/leslyeslabyrinth